Groupy versus Non-Groupy Social Preferences: Personality, Region, and Political Party†

نویسندگان

  • Rachel E. Kranton
  • Seth G. Sanders
چکیده

On the sandlot and on the battlefield, people divide into groups and fight, for bragging rights and for resources. Disputes are often between groups explicitly defined as different in terms of characteristics, values, and principles. A long social psychology tradition emphasizes such group differences as the source of conflict and bias.1 Yet, new experimental research indicates that a key explanatory for group-based bias could be individual propensities, rather than the history or nature of the social division per se. In Kranton et al. (2016), participants in a university subject pool are divided into groups and allocate income to themselves and to others. The main finding is that across group treatments, some people are “groupy,” adopting different social preferences toward those who are not in their group, but many participants are “nongroupy,” showing no such bias.2 Moreover, there is a correlation with behavior outside the lab:

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Groupy and Not Groupy Behavior: Deconstructing Bias in Social Preferences

This paper finds systematically different individual behavior in group settings. Each participant allocates income in two treatments, a minimal group setting and a political group setting. A large set of subjects show ingroup bias in both, indicating that bias depends on group division per se rather than group identity. Other subjects show no bias in either setting. While the average subject is...

متن کامل

Groupy and Non-Groupy Behavior: Deconstructing Bias in Social Preferences

This paper deconstructs social preferences in group contexts and resolves the contradiction between laboratory findings of inequity aversion and the destructive reality of group conflict. The paper replicates previous results that subjects are—on average—inequity averse towards out-group participants and more so towards in-group. However, the mean is not representative. Using a with-in subject ...

متن کامل

1 ! Group Bias , Identity , and Social Preferences

This paper reveals that a subset of subjects adopting extreme behavior underlies intergroup bias. In a simple task, we replicate previous results that, on average, subjects are less inequity averse allocating income to out-group members. Using a with-in subject design and new econometric techniques, however, we find a group division does not matter for most subjects; social preferences are the ...

متن کامل

Karen Horneys theory and Ehsan Tabaris political psychology

Purpose: Ehsan Tabari (1295-1368) was the unmistakable theoretician of the Tudeh party for more than 42 years and was also arrested and imprisoned after the political developments of the 1960s and the arrest of the leaders of this party. Shortly after his arrest in a television program, he said he has turned to Islam by reconsidering his past thoughts. Methodology: This event transformed Tabari...

متن کامل

Understanding responses to political conflict: interactive effects of the need for closure and salient conflict schemas.

Two studies examined the relationship between the need for cognitive closure and preferences for conflict-resolution strategies in 2 different samples of elite political actors. Although research has suggested that high need for closure should be associated with competitiveness, the authors argue that this relationship should be strongest among political actors with a hostile conflict schema, o...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2017